![]() In 1892 the bones were studied carefully by Dr. Delage, professor of paleontology at the University of Montpellier, in addition to other anatomists. Sabatier, professor of zoology at the University of Montpellier, and M. The bones of the giant were studied at the University of Montpellier and examined by M. The subject would have been a likely size of 3m, 50." Judging by the usual intervals of anatomical points, they also involve lengths almost double. The volumes of the bones were more than double the normal pieces to which they correspond. The third, very singular, was regarded by good anatomists as the lower part of a humerus. ![]() The circumference is 13 cm at the nutrient foramen. The second piece is the middle and upper part of the shaft of a tibia. The first is the middle part of the shaft of a femur, 14 cm length, almost cylindrical in shape, and the circumference of the bone is 16 cm. Writing in the journal La Nature, de Lapouge describes the bones in detail: "I think it unnecessary to note that these bones are undeniably human, despite their enormous size. The journal includes a photo engraving of what was identified as the humerus, tibia, and femoral mid-shaft of the giant compared to a normal The height of the giant was estimated at 3.50 m (11 ft 6 in) according to de Lapouge, and the bones were dated to the Neolithic period, since they were found at the very bottom of the Bronze Age burial tumulus. His findings were published in the journal La Nature, Vol. The bones were discovered by the Georges Vacher de Lapouge in the Bronze Age cemetery of Castelnau-le-Lez, France during the winter of 1890. He estimated from the bone size that the human may have been about 3.50 m (11 ft 6 in) tall. According to de Lapouge, the fossil bones may belong to one of the largest humans known to have existed. " Giant of Castelnau" refers to three bone fragments (a humerus, tibia, and femoral mid-shaft) discovered by Georges Vacher de Lapouge in 1890 in the sediment used to cover a Bronze Age burial tumulus, and dating possibly back to the Neolithic. Three bone fragments of the named "Giant of Castelnau" compared to a regular-size humerus (centre), according to Georges Vacher de Lapouge.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |